Skip to main content

Department of War Disputes Second Attack on Boat Strike Survivors Was a “Double-Tap”

“Quibbling over the semantics of ‘double-tap’ doesn’t change the reality that the strike was a summary execution of men clinging to the remains of a boat.”

Vice Admiral Frank Bradley, USN, nominee to be Admiral and Commander, United States Special Operation Command, at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
Frank Bradley — nominee to be admiral and commander, U.S. Special Operation Command — at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Photo: Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA via AP Images

Special Operations Command pushed back on the contention that Adm. Frank Bradley ordered a double-tap attack when the U.S. military conducted a second strike killing survivors of the September 2 boat attack in the Caribbean, first reported by The Intercept.

“He does not see his actions on 2 SEP as a ‘double tap,’” Col. Allie Weiskopf, a Special Operations Command spokesperson told The Intercept on Tuesday in response to questions about the follow-up attack.

In military jargon, the term “double tap” — which has no legal or doctrinal meaning — typically refers to a follow-on strike to kill rescuers or first responders. Such attacks have been carried out by U.S. forces in conflicts including the drone wars in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. Israel has carried out double-tap strikes in its most recent war on Gaza, targeting journalists and rescue efforts.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth acknowledged U.S. forces conducted a follow-up strike on the alleged drug boat during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Tuesday, but distanced himself from the killing of individuals clinging to the wreckage. “I didn’t personally see survivors,” Hegseth told reporters, noting that he watched live footage of the attack. “The thing was on fire. It was exploded in fire and smoke. You can’t see it.” He added, “This is called the fog of war.”

Hegseth said Bradley — then the commander of Joint Special Operations Command and now head of Special Operations Command — “made the right call” in ordering the second strike after Hegseth allegedly left the room.

The statements from Hegseth and Special Operations Command on Tuesday mark an evolution in the Pentagon’s response to the killings. But several government officials and experts on the laws of war said messaging focusing on technical definitions misses the reason this strike has drawn widespread condemnation.

“Quibbling over the semantics of ‘double-tap’ doesn’t change the reality that the strike was a summary execution of men clinging to the remains of a boat,” Sarah Harrison, who advised Pentagon policymakers on issues related to human rights and the law of war in her former role as associate general counsel at the Pentagon’s Office of General Counsel, International Affairs, told The Intercept.


Related

Entire Chain of Command Could Be Held Liable for Killing Boat Strike Survivors, Sources Say


The military has carried out 21 known attacks, destroying 22 boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean since September, killing at least 83 civilians. Since the attacks began, experts in the laws of war and members of Congress, from both parties, say the strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings because the military is not permitted to deliberately target civilians — even suspected criminals — who do not pose an imminent threat. In the long-running U.S. war on drugs, suspected smugglers have been arrested by law enforcement rather than subjected to summary execution.

The multiple strikes on September 2 added a second layer of illegality to attacks that experts and lawmakers say are already tantamount to murder. “Persons who have been incapacitated by wounds, sickness, or shipwreck are in a helpless state, and it would be dishonorable and inhumane to make them the object of attack,” reads the Pentagon’s Law of War Manual.

Weiskopf did not respond to other questions by The Intercept. “ADM Bradley looks forward to briefing Congress on your questions. He will do this on Thursday,” she wrote in an email.

Capitol Hill staffers say that Bradley is currently slated to only meet with the House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers, R-Ala., and ranking member Adam Smith, D-Wash., and the Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and ranking member Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation