With time running out before an American aircraft carrier arrives in the Caribbean, Democrats and advocates are making one final pitch to Republican lawmakers to stop Donald Trump from making war on Venezuela.
Those advocates are trying to speak the language that Trump has sometimes adopted of opposing regime change wars abroad.
Though Trump himself is reportedly toying with the idea of strikes aimed at toppling Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, his far-right Make American Great Again movement has elements that shy away from expensive, large-scale interventionism abroad.
Whereas the hawks dominated the Republican Party two decades ago, the anti-interventionist wing of the party has gained steam in recent years since Trump ran in 2016 on opposing the folly of the Iraq War and the fallout of U.S. intervention in Libya.
With what could be one final chance on Thursday night to stop Trump from attacking Venezuela — senators are poised to vote on a War Powers Resolution preventing strikes — opponents of a broader war are hoping to exploit that split. And the advocates urging restraint are pitting MAGA rhetoric against hawkish positions taken by figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, reportedly one of the loudest voices urging Trump to take more aggressive action in Latin America.
Republicans mostly rejected the idea of blocking Trump when it came to his strikes on alleged narco-boats last month, but Democrats and advocacy groups hope that a few more will flip when faced with the potential of all-out war.
They are pointing to the experience of Libya after former President Barack Obama launched an intervention there that caused a massive increase in immigration to Europe.
“Voting for this resolution is a vote against the Rubio approach inspired by the Bush-Cheney years.”
The coalition of anti-interventionist groups made their pitch to Republicans in a letter, obtained by The Intercept, being sent to senators ahead of the vote.
“Recent reporting shows that Rubio has not managed to convince Trump to launch this war, and for good reason,” said Erik Sperling, whose group Just Foreign Policy signed the letter. “A regime change war would harm Trump’s popularity and agenda. Voting for this resolution is a vote against the Rubio approach inspired by the Bush-Cheney years, and it will actually help prevent Trump from being trapped into making a grave mistake.”
Trump and other MAGA figures like Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have scathingly criticized Obama’s approach on Libya.
A similar push to constrain Trump, from figures inside and outside MAGA world, fell short in the lead-up and aftermath of his administration’s strikes on Iran in June.
Second Try to Restrain Trump
The resolution up for a vote in the Senate on Thursday night is co-sponsored by Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine of Virginia and Adam Schiff of California, along with Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Paul and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were the only two Republicans to vote in favor of the war powers resolution last month aimed at stopping the strikes on alleged drug boats.
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., was the sole Democrat to vote against the resolution and in support of the Trump administration policy. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on how he plans to vote Thursday night.
The latest resolution differs from the last one in focusing squarely on strikes on Venezuelan soil, rather than the open waters where the attacks on alleged drug boats have taken place.
Trump is considering military action aimed at toppling Maduro, according to multiple reports. The USS Gerald Ford, a powerful aircraft carrier, could enable air attacks once it arrives in the Caribbean from a tour in the Mediterranean.
Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna said in a statement that military action against Venezuela could lead to the type of “nation-building” that Trump has disdained in the past.
“Sadly, President Trump and JD Vance are betraying their promise to stay out of new regime change wars, so the U.S. Senate needs to step up and stop them,” Khanna said. “The American people are sick and tired of endless regime change wars.”
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Contact the author:
Related
Latest Stories
License to Kill
CIA Was Behind Venezuela Drone Strike, Source Says
The December 24 drone strike in Venezuela is the latest in a long tradition of CIA interventions in Latin America — which often lead to destabilization and blowback.
Midterms 2026
AIPAC Is Retreating From Endorsements and Election Spending. It Won’t Give Up Its Influence.
The lobbying group is taking a quieter approach this midterms cycle, but it’s still seeking to keep Congress in Israel’s pocket.
License to Kill
Did Trump Just Confess to Attacking Venezuela?
“They have a big plant or a big facility where the ships come from. Two nights ago, we knocked that out. We hit them very hard.”